LeakNet: Interactive Efficacy Report

From Reaction to Prevention

An interactive analysis of the financial impact of water damage and the proven efficacy of LeakNet's proactive risk mitigation.

The Unseen Flood: A Multi-Billion Pound Problem

Escape-of-water incidents are not just common; they're a growing threat, far more likely than fire or theft, with a staggering financial impact.

£6bn+

Projected claims in 2025 due to escape of water [18].

£1.8M

Paid out daily by UK insurers for escape-of-water claims [1, 2].

£1.18 paid out by property insurers for every £1 in premiums last year [18].

Risk Comparison

Water damage is 4.9x more likely than theft and 14.5x more likely than fire [21].

Disproportionate Impact

Escape-of-water accounts for a staggering 29% of all home insurance claims [21] and accounts for 1/3 of all claims by value [1].

The Recurrence Risk

50% more likely to claim a second time and 80% more likely to claim a third within 12 months [10].

Top Water Damage Claim Categories

Analysis of 5 years of data reveals the highest-cost sources of water damage, with an overall average claim value of £13,753 [19]. These values are typical across the industry [22].

The Proactive Shift

LeakNet transforms risk management by intervening *before* damage occurs, fundamentally altering the outcome of a potential leak.

Reactive Path: Damage Control

Large Loss Example: A £3.3M London property suffered a joint failure in a 5th-storey flat just two weeks before handover, wiping out 30 units below.
1. Leak Occurs
2. Water Spreads Undetected
3. Damage is Discovered
4. Costly Claims & Repairs

LeakNet's Proactive Path

Proactive Example: A complete LeakNet system was retrofitted in two blocks, monitoring every flat and every floor for half the cost of one claim. There have been ZERO leak claims in the 5 years since installation.
1. Leak Starts
2. AI Detects Anomaly Instantly
3. Water Supply Automatically Shut Off
4. Damage Prevented

Evidence Dashboard: Quantifying the Reduction

Data from LeakNet and other leading systems provide undeniable proof of dramatic risk reduction. Click on a bar to see more details.

Comparative Claim Reduction (Frequency)

LeakNet

Reduces the chance of a claim on a construction site by reducing the likelihood of a claim from 63% to 11% [6].

83%

Reduction in Claims

The Value Proposition: A Dual Impact

Smart shutoff systems deliver transformative value by reducing *both* the number of claims and their cost, directly improving loss ratios.

Frequency

The number of claims that occur.

▼ REDUCED

Severity

The average cost of each claim.

▼ REDUCED
=

Improved Loss Ratio

The Insurer's Payback Period

The investment in a smart leak solution provides a rapid return for insurers.

The calculation is based on the following: for every 1,000 properties, with an estimated claim rate of 10% [10], there are 100 claims. By reducing the claims rate by 83% [6], 83 claims are prevented, leaving 17 claims. With the average claim cost being £13,753 [19], the insurer saves an average of £1,114,499 per year for every 1,000 properties insured. This means a £1,000 solution per property has a payback period of just 0.9 years.

Note: This calculation does not include the additional benefits of reduced claim severity or increased customer retention rates [15].

£1k

/

£1.1k

per property saving per year

=

~0.9

Year Payback

✨ Business Case Generator

Describe your business case, and let AI draft an email for you.

References